2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 1975 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (150 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Cadillac LMP | 1975 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | LMP | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2001 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2520 mm |