2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Cadillac LMP | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | LMP | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2480 mm |