2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 1981 Nissan Leopard
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1981 Nissan Leopard. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1981 Nissan Leopard.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Nissan Leopard. (170 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Nissan Leopard. 2001 Cadillac LMP has automatic transmission and 1981 Nissan Leopard has manual transmission. 1981 Nissan Leopard will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac LMP will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 1981 Nissan Leopard | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | LMP | Leopard |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2630 mm |
