2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2001 Cadillac LMP is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Cadillac LMP. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 1982 Chrysler E | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | LMP | E |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2630 mm |
