2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2001 Cadillac LMP is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Cadillac LMP. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 1994 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | LMP | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 3134 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2740 mm |
