2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt.

Because 2001 Cadillac LMP is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Cadillac LMP. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. (138 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. 2001 Cadillac LMP has automatic transmission and 1996 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1996 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac LMP will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: