2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | LMP | Econoline |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3510 mm |
