2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora. (247 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora.
Because 2001 Cadillac LMP is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Cadillac LMP. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora. (353 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Cadillac LMP | 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | LMP | Aurora |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2860 mm |