2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 2006 Maserati MC12
To start off, 2006 Maserati MC12 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 5,998 cc (12 cylinders), 2006 Maserati MC12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Maserati MC12 (623 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 323 more horse power than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Maserati MC12 should accelerate faster than 2001 Cadillac LMP.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Maserati MC12 (652 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (401 Nm). This means 2006 Maserati MC12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Cadillac LMP. 2001 Cadillac LMP has automatic transmission and 2006 Maserati MC12 has manual transmission. 2006 Maserati MC12 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac LMP will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Cadillac LMP | 2006 Maserati MC12 | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | LMP | MC12 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 5998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 623 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 652 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2810 mm |