2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK (355 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2001 Cadillac LMP.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK (510 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (401 Nm). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Cadillac LMP.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | LMP | SLK |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 5439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 355 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 510 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2440 mm |
