2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (395 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 Cadillac LMP.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Mustang. (240 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | LMP | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 395 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2740 mm |
