2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. (297 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Cadillac LMP. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. (315 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | LMP | Range Rover Sport |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 297 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2750 mm |
