2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. (169 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. (400 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. 2001 Cadillac LMP has automatic transmission and 2009 Mercedes-Benz C has manual transmission. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac LMP will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 2009 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | LMP | C |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2148 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2770 mm |
