2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (387 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (300 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2001 Cadillac LMP.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (520 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (401 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Cadillac LMP.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | LMP | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 387 HP |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 520 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2838 mm |
