2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2010 Mercedes-Benz R. (210 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 2010 Mercedes-Benz R.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Cadillac LMP. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz R (542 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (401 Nm). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Cadillac LMP.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 2010 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | LMP | R |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 6 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3216 mm |
