2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. Both 2001 Cadillac LMP and 2010 Toyota 4Runner are equipped with a 4,000 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. (157 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota 4Runner.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota 4Runner. (241 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | LMP | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 241 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 7 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2789 mm |
