2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL (429 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 2001 Cadillac LMP.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Cadillac LMP. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL (699 Nm) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (401 Nm). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Cadillac LMP.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | LMP | CL |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 429 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 699 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2954 mm |
