2001 Cadillac XLR vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2001 Cadillac XLR is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 278 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1960 Lotus Seven has manual transmission. 1960 Lotus Seven will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac XLR | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | XLR | Seven |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 316 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 29 L |
