2001 Cadillac XLR vs. 1998 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2001 Cadillac XLR is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1998 Ford Taurus. (200 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Taurus.
Because 2001 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac XLR (401 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Taurus. (264 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2001 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Cadillac XLR | 1998 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | XLR | Taurus |
Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 316 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 264 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |