2001 Cadillac XLR vs. 2003 Ford Model U
To start off, 2003 Ford Model U is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac XLR would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Because 2003 Ford Model U is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Cadillac XLR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac XLR (401 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2001 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac XLR | 2003 Ford Model U | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | XLR | Model U |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 316 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1660 mm |
