2001 Cadillac XLR vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac XLR would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 834 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac XLR (401 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2001 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac XLR | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Smart |
| Model | XLR | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 316 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 81 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 33 L |
