2001 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 415 kg more than 1952 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Ford Crestline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Astro | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Astro | Crestline |
Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 3929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2940 mm |