2001 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1955 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 375 kg more than 1955 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Astro | 1955 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Astro | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 4785 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 1520 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3000 mm |
