2001 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 785 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Astro | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Astro | Munga |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 76.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 74 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2010 mm |