2001 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 687 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Astro has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Astro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Astro | 2000 Ford Equator | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Astro | Equator |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1787 cc |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 160 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3260 mm |