2001 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 444 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Astro. (338 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Astro | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Astro | C30 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2639 mm |