2001 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 580 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 2001 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Chevrolet Blazer 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Chevrolet Oldsmobile
Model Blazer Cutlass
Year Released 2001 1985
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4294 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 187 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1900 kg 1320 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2680 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]