2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 735 kg more than 1951 Saab 92.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 1951 Saab 92 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
Model | Camaro | 92 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1951 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3400 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2480 mm |