2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1960 Skoda 1200
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 530 kg more than 1960 Skoda 1200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro (475 Nm) has 391 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Skoda 1200. (84 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Skoda 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 1960 Skoda 1200 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
| Model | Camaro | 1200 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5698 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 38 L |
