2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 965 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro (475 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Camaro | 600 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5698 cc | 767 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2010 mm |
