2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 874 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Camaro | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5698 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 33 L |
