2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 MG 1100
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG 1100 would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 700 kg more than 1967 MG 1100.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro (475 Nm) has 381 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG 1100. (94 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 1967 MG 1100 | |
Make | Chevrolet | MG |
Model | Camaro | 1100 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 94 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2380 mm |