2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1968 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 780 kg more than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro (475 Nm) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 1968 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Camaro | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 5698 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 66 L |
