2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1991 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 805 kg more than 1991 Mini MK VI.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mini MK VI. (116 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 1991 Mini MK VI | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Camaro | MK VI |
Year Released | 2001 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3400 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 116 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2040 mm |