2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. (95 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Mum 500 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3400 cc | 500 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 95 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |