2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Mazda Familia
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 433 kg more than 1996 Mazda Familia.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Familia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Mazda Familia | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | Familia |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3390 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |