2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 82 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro (475 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (320 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Camaro | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1622 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 72 L |