2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Chevrolet Evanda
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 43 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro (475 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. (176 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Chevrolet Evanda | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | Camaro | Evanda |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5698 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
| Torque | 475 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1497 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 65 L |
