2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. (160 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | E-150 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3390 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |