2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 55 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Crossfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro (475 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Crossfire. (311 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Camaro | Crossfire |
Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 311 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 60 L |