2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan GT-R weights approximately 197 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2010 Nissan GT-R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. (271 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Camaro | GT-R |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3400 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 485 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 588 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1737 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2779 mm |
