2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2012 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 669 kg more than 2012 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro (475 Nm) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 2012 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daewoo |
Model | Camaro | Matiz |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5698 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 87 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 871 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 35 L |