2001 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Acura TL
To start off, 2013 Acura TL is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Acura TL weights approximately 260 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2013 Acura TL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Acura TL (370 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro. (271 Nm). This means 2013 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Acura TL | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
| Model | Camaro | TL |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3400 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 370 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4928 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2118 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1452 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2775 mm |
