2001 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1962 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 146 kg more than 1962 Jaguar MK II.
Because 1962 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier (203 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1962 Jaguar MK II | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Cavalier | MK II |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 195 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1452 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2900 mm |