2001 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1972 Mazda RX-4
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 488 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-4.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier (203 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1972 Mazda RX-4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cavalier | RX-4 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 165 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2520 mm |