2001 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1989 Volvo 760
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volvo 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volvo 760 would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 136 kg more than 1989 Volvo 760.
Because 1989 Volvo 760 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Volvo 760. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Volvo 760 (263 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier. (203 Nm). This means 1989 Volvo 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1989 Volvo 760 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Cavalier | 760 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2314 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 263 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1462 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2780 mm |