2001 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 868 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2003 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier (203 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (95 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Cavalier | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
Model | Cavalier | Smart |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 95 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2370 mm |