2001 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 2003 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2003 MG ZT-T is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT-T weights approximately 27 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT-T (250 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier. (203 Nm). This means 2003 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier | 2003 MG ZT-T | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MG |
| Model | Cavalier | ZT-T |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2397 cc | 2495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |
