2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Celta is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher.
Because 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Celta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Celta | 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Celta | 220 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 78 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 48 L |