2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 1952 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Celta is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 125 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Celta.
Because 1952 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Celta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Celta | 1952 Hudson Hornet | |
Make | Chevrolet | Hudson |
Model | Celta | Hornet |
Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 144 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2990 mm |